Business plan · Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences

Women's Health, Continuously

A Growth Plan for Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences

[Candidate Name], MD Chair candidate, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston Prepared October 2026

Labels used throughout: ESTIMATE = modeling input or derived figure; UNVERIFIED = from a secondary source or not confirmed against a primary source. All dollar figures are annual unless noted. $M = millions.

1Executive summary

Move from episodic visits to continuous, lifespan relationships. Grow where competitors are thin. Make existing AI investments pay.

The department already holds assets that only one other Houston program matches and that Houston Methodist cannot copy quickly: Level IV maternal care at Memorial Hermann-TMC, The Fetal Center, the NICHD MFMU network site, and nine hospitals served (eight Memorial Hermann plus Harris Health LBJ). This plan builds three engines and one enabler on that base, across three horizons (H1 0-12 months, H2 12-36 months, H3 3-5 years).

1. Grow the front doorSuburban satellites (west Fort Bend first), a hybrid "UTHealth Signature" membership, and a Midlife & Pelvic Health Center.
2. Connected careThe Postpartum Year (remote BP + cardio-obstetrics), perinatal mental health collaborative care, tele-MFM and eConsult hub. Recurring revenue.
3. Discovery & dataHouston Perinatal Data Commons, a precision prediction portfolio, and prevention at scale. Grants plus industry contracts.
Enabler: AI & cost to serveAI to revenue (referral-to-revenue analytics, coding integrity with the existing Abridge scribe, prior-auth automation, inbox and RPM alert triage) plus operational cost reduction (ERAS, OR supply stewardship, prenatal care redesign, safety). Not new AI research; making current investments pay.
~$3.1M
Capital ask, 3 modeled initiatives ($1.6M + $0.5M + $1.0M)
-$1.49M
Year 1 combined system contribution
+$0.98M
Year 2 system contribution (incl. MH downstream; needs funds-flow)
+$3.59M
Year 3 combined (conservative ~+$2.5M)

System contribution = clinic contribution plus downstream hospital contribution at Memorial Hermann. The plan is system-positive in Year 2 only with a Memorial Hermann funds-flow agreement. Department-only (clinic) contribution is -$2.54M / -$1.09M / +$0.22M in Years 1-3. All three models are ESTIMATE. Connected-care revenue is upside and not in these totals.

Top 3 risks

  1. No funds-flow agreement with Memorial Hermann. Without credit for downstream hospital margin, the satellite clinic alone still loses -$0.56M in Year 3.
  2. Payer mix and collections. The satellite clinic breaks even only at ~$106 collections per wRVU (model uses $95). Texas has the highest uninsured rate in the US.
  3. Well-capitalized competitors. Houston Methodist (#7 U.S. News OB/GYN, new $10M OB/GYN fund) and Texas Children's ($200M+ Pavilion expansion, community MFM clinics) can respond fast.

2Situation

Department strengths

Market forces

ForceWhat changedImplication
PolicyTexas 12-month postpartum Medicaid/CHIP effective March 1, 2024 (HB 12)41. Texas is not in the CMS TMaH model. Doulas not covered by Texas Medicaid (June 2026). HB 1649 (2023)50 mandates fertility-preservation coverage in state-regulated plans. HB 2727 (2023)49 requires high-risk pregnancy home telemonitoring if cost-effective (implementation UNVERIFIED).A payer now exists for months 2-12 postpartum. Oncofertility has insured demand by law.
RegulatoryFDA moved to remove boxed warnings for cardiovascular disease, breast cancer and dementia from menopausal hormone therapy (Nov 10, 2025)52; the endometrial cancer warning for estrogen-alone products remains, and labels are updating product by product. Elinzanetant (Lynkuet) approved Oct 24, 202553. Fezolinetant carries a liver-injury boxed warning with lab monitoring. FDA-cleared fetal heart AI (BrightHeart61, Sonio), AI cytology (Hologic Genius)63 and at-home HPV self-collection (Teal Wand, May 2025)62.Expect higher menopause demand and counseling need. Tools for screening at scale are cleared.
PaymentCY 2026 conversion factor $33.4009 (+3.26%), but the temporary +2.5% expires end of 2026. A -2.5% efficiency adjustment hits procedures; time-based services (RPM, care management) are largely exempt. New short-duration RPM codes 99445 and 99470. G2211 still paid. Medicare hospital-at-home waiver extended to Sept 30, 2030 (Medicare fee-for-service only; covers few obstetric patients). No OB-specific AI billing codes.Recurring, time-based services gain relative value. AI earns through capacity and coding accuracy, not new fees.
DemographicsHouston MSA ~7.9M, +126,720 in one year (largest US gain); median age 35.7; 5.6% of women 15-50 gave birth in the past year. Montgomery +4% and Fort Bend +2.5% in one year; Fulshear +237% in 5 years. Harris County 65+ projected +47% by 2030 (older projection, UNVERIFIED).Growth is suburban and both young (births) and aging (midlife, pelvic floor).
Payer mix and needTexas uninsured 16.7% (rank 50 of 50); Harris County under-65 uninsured 23.8%. Medicaid finances about half of Texas births. Preterm birth: Texas 11.1% (grade D), Harris County 12.0%. About 80% of pregnancy-related deaths judged preventable; 1 in 4 occur 43 days to 1 year postpartum. About 46.5% of Texas counties are maternity care deserts.New revenue must target commercially insured and Medicare populations, while the mission base supplies research and quality leadership.
CompetitionHouston Methodist: ~14,000 births across 8 hospitals, no Level IV. Texas Children's: $200M+ Pavilion expansion (July 2026)21, 8 community MFM clinics, Menopause Center. Kelsey-Seybold adding Cypress. Midi Health (virtual menopause) at a ~$150M run rate (CEO-reported)54.Compete on complexity and continuity, not on low-risk suburban births.

3Market analysis

Houston numbers

MetricValueStatus
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands MSA population (July 2025)7,904,627Sourced
MSA median household income (ACS 2024)$81,417Sourced
MSA households2,768,708Sourced
MSA births per year (model input)~105,000ESTIMATE cross-checked two ways
Harris County births65,450Sourced (year likely 2023)
Harris Health System births (FY2023)5,494Sourced
Women in MSA: all / 15-44 / 45-64 / 65+~3.98M / ~1.67M / ~0.96M / ~0.54MESTIMATE replace with ACS B01001
Fulshear median household income$178,398Sourced
Montgomery County / Fort Bend County one-year gain+30,011 / +24,163Sourced

TAM / SAM / SOM by service line

TAM = annual spend if every relevant woman in the 9-county MSA used the service. SAM = the part UT Physicians plus Memorial Hermann can realistically serve. SOM = what the department can capture by Year 3. All values are ESTIMATE.

Service lineTAMSAMSOM (Y3)Key assumptions
A. Midlife: menopause + pelvic floor~$790M~$111M~$4-5.5MMenopause: ~956K women 45-64 x 20% moderate/severe x $1,200 = $229M. Pelvic floor: ~1.49M women 45+ x 25% x $1,500 = $560M. SAM = TAM x 50% catchment x 80% insured x 35% seek care. SOM 4-5% of SAM (pro forma Y3 revenue $4.2M).
B. Suburban OB/GYN satellites (professional fees)~$738M~$258M~$4.1M per siteOB: 105K births x $3,500 = $368M. Gyn: ~2.47M women 18-64 x 60% x $250 = $371M. SAM = 35% (west Fort Bend, west Harris, Waller, Montgomery). SOM ~1.6% of corridor; 4 MDs, ~530 deliveries. Hospital value is extra.
C. Concierge / membership~$830M~$33M~$1.8M~2.77M households x 10% earning $200K+ (UNVERIFIED) x $3,000. SAM = 40% within 25-30 min of core sites x 10% willing (~11K members). SOM = 500 members (4.5% of SAM).
D. Connected pregnancy RPM~$42M~$10.5M MSA at-risk; ~$0.6M dept.~$0.5M direct105K births x $400 per RPM episode; 25% at-risk share; department deliveries placeholder 6,000/yr. Main value is quality, avoided readmissions and payer credit.
E. Rural / maternity-desert tele-hubNot sized--~4.1% of Texas births (15,287) occur in maternity care deserts. Framed as MFM eConsult + RPM extension of D; grant and MCO funded.

The two inputs that matter most for credibility: female age-band counts (replace with ACS B01001) and MSA births (replace with DSHS Vital Statistics Table 9).

Where to grow

CorridorDemandCompetitionRead
West Fort Bend / Fulshear / Richmond-RosenbergFulshear +237% in 5 yrs; $178K median incomeHM Sugar Land strong; MH Katy $282.5M tower; no TCH general OB/GYN foundFirst. UT already has Cinco Ranch and Rosenberg sites.
Montgomery (Conroe, north I-45)+30K/yr, fastest numeric growthCrowded at The Woodlands (HM, Kelsey, TCH MFM)Second. Conroe likely under-built.
Cypress / 290 corridorHigh growthHM Cypress (2025), MH Cypress tower (2027), Kelsey Cypress (2026)Avoid for general OB/GYN; MFM outreach only.
TMC / LBJHighest volume, Medicaid-heavyTCH, HM, BSLMC, Harris HealthMission, residency and research base.

Corridor reads are analysis from search results; confirm with a drive-time study.

4Competitive analysis

DimensionHouston MethodistUTHealth + Memorial Hermann + LBJBaylor / Texas Children'sKelsey-Seybold
Deliveries~14,000/yr across 8 hospitals (2025); TMC flagship 1,506~7,900/yr at MH-TMC + LBJ (undated)6,000+/yr Pavilion for WomenNot researched
Top maternal levelLevel III (no Level IV)Level IV (MH-TMC)Level IV (TCH; Ben Taub)Not applicable (clinic group)
MFM / fetalNo MFM division listed; TCH lists an MFM clinic at the HM West campus addressThe Fetal Center; accreta program; MFM fellowshipFetal Center; large MFM network, 8 community clinicsNot researched
U.S. News OB/GYN (2026-27)#7 national (self-reported)#42 national (MH-TMC)Not found UNVERIFIED-
MenopauseNo dedicated program foundMH + Midi Health telehealth (2023)Dedicated Menopause CenterNot researched
Pelvic floorStrong: Center for Restorative Pelvic Medicine; Houston's first ACGME urogyn fellowshipUrogynecology Program at 6 outpatient sitesPelvic Health and Wellness CenterNot researched
FertilityFertility and Reproductive Medicine Program (IVF)No visible REI divisionFamily Fertility Center UNVERIFIEDNot researched
Footprint8 hospitals; 219 specialty + 47 primary care locations9 hospitals served (8 Memorial Hermann + LBJ); UT Physicians Women's CentersTMC Pavilion; MFM clinics in suburbs; OB/GYN in Pearland24-25+ locations; OB/GYN in Downtown, Woodlands, Atascocita, Katy, Rice Village, Greater Heights; Cypress ~May 2026
Digital / AIAmbience ambient AI enterprise-wide; BioButton RPM on ~2,600 beds; no maternal digital program foundAbridge (UT System); SBMI AI centersUNVERIFIEDNot researched
ResearchHospital academic institute; 25 OB/GYN trials; not an MFMU member (inference)NICHD MFMU + NRN (only in Texas)Medical school department; large research base-
Capital~$4.4B revenue, ~$470M surplus (FY2024, one entity); $10M OB/GYN fund (2026)Partner capital via MH towers (Katy, Cypress)$200M+ Pavilion expansion-
Stance toward Houston Methodist. Compete on complexity (Level IV vs their Level III ceiling, The Fetal Center, MFM), menopause, the postpartum year and data. Partner where useful, for example tele-MFM and transfer agreements with Level I-II community hospitals, after alignment with Memorial Hermann. Do not fight on suburban low-risk births, concierge prestige or short-term U.S. News rank.

Department SWOT

Strengths

  • Level IV, The Fetal Center, accreta program
  • MFMU + NRN; diverse safety-net cohort at LBJ
  • Nine hospitals served (eight Memorial Hermann plus LBJ)
  • Urogyn sites across suburbs; a 60+ incontinence referral pathway (as I understand it)
  • Abridge and SBMI AI infrastructure in place

Weaknesses

  • Payer mix concentrated in Medicaid and uninsured at TMC/LBJ (mission strength, margin pressure)
  • From public sources, no dedicated menopause, cardio-obstetrics or REI program found; please correct me where these exist (UT Physicians' adult congenital heart clinic already manages high-risk pregnancy with MFM)
  • Ranking: MH-TMC newly ranked #42 (2026-27); room to climb
  • Department AI work not yet publicly visible (opportunity to publish)

Opportunities

  • 12-month postpartum Medicaid; new RPM codes
  • HRT label change and new non-hormonal drugs
  • Suburban growth; MH Katy and Cypress towers
  • HM gaps in Level IV, MFM, menopause
  • New LBJ hospital (late 2028); ORWH budget up

Threats

  • HM capital, brand and suburban birth franchise
  • TCH Pavilion expansion and MFM clinics in HM corridors
  • Baylor Menopause Center; Midi Health virtual care
  • 2027 fee schedule cut pressure; OPPS neuromodulation cuts proposed
  • High uninsured rate

5Initiatives

Horizons: H1 0-12 months, H2 12-36 months, H3 3-5 years. Medicare figures are 2026 national, non-facility, approximate; Houston, facility, commercial and Texas Medicaid rates differ.

Engine 1 · Grow the front door
1. Suburban satellite networkH1 plan · H2 open
What
8,000 SF OB/GYN satellite in west Fort Bend / Fulshear-Richmond first; Conroe / north Montgomery second. Avoid Cypress for general OB/GYN. Add MFM outreach clinics in Methodist corridors, in Memorial Hermann suburban campuses.
Why now
Fulshear +237% in 5 years at $178K median income; MH Katy tower adds a delivery partner; Texas Children's lists an MFM clinic at the Methodist West campus address.
Revenue model
Professional fees + ancillary (ultrasound, labs); downstream deliveries and gyn surgery at Memorial Hermann under a funds-flow agreement.
Lead metric
New patients per month; wRVU ramp vs 55% / 80% / 95% plan; deliveries to MH (154 / 336 / 532).
2. "UTHealth Signature" hybrid membershipH1
What
Concierge women's health membership inside an existing TMC / Bellaire / Memorial City site. Core ~$2,500, premium ~$5,000 per year. Still bills insurance for covered visits. Membership covers only non-covered services (access, navigation, extended counseling); compliance review for Medicare and Medicaid members and institutional approval of the fee schedule before launch. Paired with a mission program.
Why now
No Houston concierge OB/GYN price found; benchmarks: Scripps $3,780, MDVIP "low four figures", MD2 Houston $24,000.
Revenue model
Membership fee (average $3,000) + ~$600 per member per year insurance billing. Feeds commercial deliveries, surgery and philanthropy.
Lead metric
Members (150 / 350 / 500); operating and cumulative breakeven in Y2 (~370 members at full Y3 staffing); renewal rate.
3. Midlife & Pelvic Health CenterH1-H2
What
Extend the existing referral pathway for women over 60 with incontinence (as I understand it; scope to confirm) into a closed-loop continence pathway: screen, digital pelvic floor therapy, PT, PTNS / implantable tibial stimulation, surgery. Add integrated menopause care (cardiometabolic, bone, GSM). Differentiate from Baylor's Menopause Center by network reach and integration.
Why now
HRT boxed warnings for CV, breast cancer and dementia being removed (Nov 2025); elinzanetant approved (Oct 2025); no dedicated HM menopause program found. UI reaches ~38% in women over 60, and only ~25% of women with UI seek care.
Codes
E/M + G2211; DEXA 77080; urodynamics 51728/51729 + 51797; PTNS 64566 (~$117 office per session); pessary 57160; biofeedback 90912/90913; RTM 98975/98977/98980 (pelvic floor fit UNVERIFIED); Category III codes for implantable tibial stimulation (confirm per device).
Lead metric
Share of referred women who complete the pathway; time to first treatment; surgical cases (82 / 120 / 214).
Engine 2 · Connected care (recurring revenue)
4. The Postpartum YearH1 pilot
What
Remote BP monitoring after hypertensive pregnancy through month 12, plus a cardio-obstetrics clinic that formalizes the existing cardiology-MFM collaboration (UT Physicians' adult congenital heart clinic already offers high-risk pregnancy management with MFM) and covers the postpartum year.
Why now
12-month Texas postpartum Medicaid; 1 in 4 pregnancy-related deaths occur 43 days to 1 year postpartum; new 2-15 day RPM codes make short monitoring months billable. Penn reported HTN readmissions 5% to 1%55; UW 0.5% vs 3.7%56 (non-randomized). No HM maternal digital program found.
Codes
99453 (~$22), 99454 or 99445 (~$47), 99457 (~$52) or 99470 (~$26), 99458 (~$41): ~$73-140 per patient-month at 2026 Medicare national rates. Most postpartum patients are Medicaid or commercial; Texas Medicaid (TMPPM) and commercial rates and the prior-auth path are UNVERIFIED.
Lead metric
Share of hypertensive-pregnancy patients enrolled; BP check completion in week 1; postpartum HTN readmissions.
5. Perinatal mental health collaborative careH1-H2
What
Screening plus a behavioral health care manager and psychiatric consultant across prenatal and postpartum visits (ACOG-supported model).
Codes
99492-99494 (rates not retrieved; comparable Medicare APCM add-on rates ~$146-162 per patient-month, vendor-reported, and APCM requires a primary-care relationship); DMHT G0552-G0554. Texas Medicaid coverage UNVERIFIED.
Lead metric
Screening rate; share of enrolled patients with a 50% symptom drop.
6. Tele-MFM and eConsult hubH2
What
MFM and urogyn eConsults and tele-MFM for maternity care deserts and for Level I-II hospitals across the region, including transfer agreements, after alignment with Memorial Hermann. Anchored on Level IV status and The Fetal Center.
Why now
About 46.5% of Texas counties are maternity care deserts; 15,287 babies born there. HM has no Level IV hospital.
Codes
99451 (~$35.40 per consult); 99446-99449; 99452 for the referrer. Grant and MCO contracts.
Lead metric
eConsults per month; transfers accepted; referrals from community hospitals.
Engine 3 · Discovery & data (grants + industry)
7. Houston Perinatal Data CommonsH2-H3
What
Biobank (serum, cfRNA, placenta photos and pathology, ultrasound, CTG, EHR) plus real-world-evidence contracts. Built alongside the NICHD MFMU site: reuse the department's research-coordinator expertise and SOPs, under a separate IRB protocol, funding and data governance.
Position
Houston already has a perinatal biobank (Baylor/Texas Children's PeriBank, since 2011). The Commons links MH-TMC, LBJ and the MH suburban network, adds remote-monitoring and imaging data, and is federated-ready, so it partners with existing Houston biobanks rather than duplicating them.
Revenue model
Industry RWE contracts (e.g., Mirvie, Thermo Fisher, BrightHeart, PeriGen); federated consortia; NIH.
Lead metric
Consented participants; signed industry contracts; grant dollars.
8. Precision prediction portfolioH1-H3
What
sFlt-1/PlGF triage for patients hospitalized with hypertensive disorders at 23-35 weeks (FDA cleared May 202358; ratio ≥40 = high risk; PRAECIS, 18 US hospitals, manufacturer-funded). Pragmatic trial of FMF first-trimester screening vs US risk-factor selection for aspirin (ASPRE RCT: aspirin 150 mg vs placebo in FMF screen-positive women cut preterm preeclampsia by >60%; FMF screening vs US risk-factor selection not yet tested head-to-head in the US). AI fetal heart QI network (BrightHeart, Sonio). Prospective "silent trial" of a PPH model (external AUC 0.60 in one validation60).
Revenue model
Comparative-effectiveness grants; industry partnerships; shorter antepartum stays.
Lead metric
Protocols live; grant submissions; unnecessary prolonged antepartum stays and iatrogenic preterm delivery (within the cleared indication).
9. Prevention at scaleH2
What
At-home HPV self-collection outreach (Teal Wand, FDA May 2025) for under-screened Harris County women; AI cytology with Pathology (Hologic Genius, cleared Jan 2024; company reports 28% fewer false negatives); oncofertility service under Texas HB 1649.
Revenue model
Screening and follow-up visits; NCI funding (CPRIT fit UNVERIFIED); insured oncofertility demand.
Lead metric
Screening completion among overdue women; oncofertility consult time.
Enabler · AI & cost to serve
10. AI to revenue: make existing AI investments payH1
What
Referral-to-revenue loop analytics on the 60+ referral pathway. Documentation and coding integrity with the existing Abridge scribe (G2211, accurate E/M). Prior-auth automation. Inbox and RPM alert triage.
Why
No AI-specific OB/GYN codes exist; AI earns through capacity, coding accuracy and quality scores. HM already runs ambient AI enterprise-wide.
Guardrail
Compliance audit of AI-drafted notes to avoid overstating medical decision-making.
Lead metric
Note closure time; E/M distribution vs benchmark; G2211 capture; denial rate; referral completion.
11. Lower the cost to serveH1-H2
What
Extend and audit cesarean and gyn ERAS (where not already standard) with same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy; gyn OR supply stewardship; prenatal care redesign (MiPATH schedules, virtual visits, APP/RN routine care); NTSV cesarean reduction through TexasAIM; an OB patient safety program; prior-auth and denial automation.
Why now
About $2.4-7.2M per year across all parties ESTIMATE. Under DRG payment, hospital cost cuts become hospital margin. The UT System liability plan is self-insured and has used partial experience rating (2002 Regents policy; confirm current formula).
Value model
Department-direct savings of ~$0.3-1.2M; hospital savings shared through gainsharing or co-management with Memorial Hermann; payer savings through value-based contracts with MCOs. See Section 6.
Lead metric
Cost per case; length of stay; NTSV cesarean rate; supply spend per case; denial rate.

6Lowering the cost to serve

Growth is half the plan. The other half is lowering what each patient, case and claim costs. All savings below are ESTIMATE, based on a department of 60-80 faculty and about 8,000 deliveries per year, a 32% cesarean rate (~2,560 cesareans), 400-700 hysterectomies and 3,000-5,000 gyn OR cases. None of these volumes is confirmed UNVERIFIED. Many source studies are old (2008-2016) and not inflation-adjusted. These savings are reported separately and are not added to the system contribution totals in Section 7.

Ranked cost initiatives

#InitiativeMechanismEvidenceAnnual savingsWho captures
1Perioperative pathway bundleExtend and audit cesarean and gyn ERAS where not already standard (early feeding and mobilization, opioid-sparing analgesia, early catheter removal) + same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomyModerate; pre-post and meta-analysis. Next-day discharge cost $207 more per case (2000-2010 data)$0.99-1.60MHospitals (via co-management)
2Gyn OR supply stewardshipPreference cards, surgeon cost scorecards, reprocessed sealers, robotic stewardship for straightforward benign casesModerate; scorecards cut supply cost per case 6.5% (JAMA Surgery); unused card items $1,294 per case; robotic benign hysterectomy $2,189 more per case (JAMA 2013, 2007-2010 data)$355K-1.11MHospitals (ask for gainsharing)
3Prenatal care redesignMiPATH tailored schedules (~14 to ~9 visits for low-risk patients), virtual visits, APP/RN routine careModerate for safety (AJOG 2021; AHRQ 2023); cost is ESTIMATE$220K-1.47M capacityDepartment (capacity, space avoided)
4Access operationsCentralized scheduling, predictive overbooking, remindersWeak to moderate; $196 per missed visit (2008 data); reminders alone cut no-shows only 16.3% to 15.8%$147K-784K capacityDepartment / UT Physicians
5NTSV cesarean reductionTexasAIM bundle, labor management standards; extend the Ob/Gyn Hospitalist division's model across suburban MH sitesStrong for rate change (California, JAMA); Medicaid paid $4,459 more for cesarean than vaginal birth (2010 data, secondary)$250K-430KPayers (Texas Medicaid MCOs); hospital beds
6Revenue-cycle adminPrior-auth automation + denial preventionModerate; ~39 prior auths per physician per week (AMA 2024); ~$25 to rework a denial (MGMA, ~2017)$155K-425KUT Physicians
7OB patient safety programAIM bundles, simulation, EFM certification, patient safety nurseModerate-strong (Yale), single site$50K-240K premiumUT System plan, department; hospitals (claims avoided)
8Ambulatory shiftOffice hysteroscopy and office proceduresModerate; US study $1,498 per patient in charges; high end overstates cost$50K-450KPayers, hospital OR capacity; department revenue
9Language and documentationVideo remote interpreting; retire scribe or transcription spend now covered by AbridgeWeak (vendor data); baseline spend UNVERIFIED$90K-575KDepartment / UT Physicians
10Postpartum remote BPReadmission avoidance (savings side of Initiative 4)Moderate (small cohorts); net $93 per patient after $309 program cost$74K-112KHospital and payer

Ranked by size x strength of evidence x department control. All savings ranges are ESTIMATE. The department already has an Ob/Gyn Hospitalists division and an AMIG division, and whether ERAS runs today is UNVERIFIED; where these are already in place, the savings are partly banked and the gain is in measuring and sharing them.

Who captures the savings

PartyFrom ranksAnnual savings (ESTIMATE)Type
Hospitals (Memorial Hermann, Harris Health)1, 2, 10~$1.4-2.8MHard cash
Department / UT Physicians6, 7, 9~$0.3-1.2MCash
Payers (mostly Texas Medicaid MCOs)5, 8~$0.3-0.9MCash to payer
Freed capacity3, 4remainder (~$0.37-2.25M)Revenue only if freed slots are filled
Total, all parties1-10~$2.4-7.2M

Three best-evidenced items

  1. Cesarean and gyn ERAS. A pre-post study of 3,679 cesareans73 found $349 lower median direct cost per cesarean and a ~0.5-day shorter stay (3.2 to 2.7 days), with no change in 30-day readmissions. A gyn ERAS meta-analysis74 reports a mean saving of $2,129 per patient (figure from a search summary, UNVERIFIED against full text).
  2. NTSV cesarean reduction. California's CMQCC collaboratives cut the NTSV cesarean rate from 26.0% to 22.8% (2014-2019) with no added severe newborn complications (JAMA)79, while the US rate stayed at 26.0%.
  3. OB patient safety program. Yale-New Haven's program90 reported claims payments falling from $50.7M to $2.9M and department malpractice premiums from $95K to $53K per year91. Single site. The UT System plan is self-insured92 and has used partial experience rating (2002 Regents policy; confirm current formula), so claims improvement can lower premiums, with a 3-5 year lag.

Deliberately not counted

Key message. Most savings land with hospitals and payers, not the department. The department's share depends on three agreements: funds-flow terms with Memorial Hermann, gainsharing or co-management for perioperative and supply savings, and value-based contracts with Medicaid MCOs for cesarean, readmission and prenatal savings. Without them, the department does the work and partners keep the savings.

7Financial plan

All three pro formas are ESTIMATE, $M. Contribution margin = revenue minus direct costs (including build-out depreciation), before dean's tax and central overhead. Inputs are assumptions except where tied to cited benchmarks (AMGA comp and wRVU, Houston rents).

7a. Satellite OB/GYN clinic (west Fort Bend / Fulshear-Katy, 8,000 SF)

Y1Y2Y3
Professional + ancillary revenue1.192.614.13
Direct costs2.623.654.69
Clinic contribution margin-1.42-1.04-0.56
Deliveries / gyn surgeries to MH154 / 66336 / 144532 / 228
Hospital net revenue (downstream)2.515.478.66
Hospital contribution at 30%0.751.642.60
Combined system contribution-0.67+0.60+2.04

Inputs: capex $1.6M (7-yr depreciation $229K/yr); rent $320K; MDs 2 / 3 / 4; APPs 1 / 1.5 / 2; productivity 55% / 80% / 95% of AMGA median 7,681 wRVU69; $95 collections per wRVU; MD comp $419K + 25% benefits; 3.5 support staff per MD at $58K; malpractice $40K per MD.

7b. "UTHealth Signature" hybrid membership

Y1Y2Y3
Revenue (fees + insurance)0.541.261.80
Direct costs0.731.061.34
Contribution margin-0.19+0.20+0.46
Margin-36%16%25%

Inputs: average fee $3,000; members 150 / 350 / 500; +$600 per member insurance billing; MDs 0.5 / 1.0 / 1.5 FTE (~330 panel per FTE); nurse navigators 1 / 2 / 2 at $95K; capex $500K; marketing $150K then $100K.

7c. Midlife & Pelvic Health Center (Memorial City or west corridor, 5,000 SF)

Y1Y2Y3
Revenue1.312.524.18
Direct costs2.232.763.85
Contribution margin-0.93-0.25+0.32
Surgical cases to hospital82120214
Hospital contribution (cases x $12K x 30%)0.300.430.77
Combined system contribution-0.63+0.18+1.09

Inputs: urogynecologist 1 / 1 / 1.5 FTE at $1.0M collections, comp $450K + 25%; menopause OB/GYN 0.5 / 0.5 / 1.0 FTE; NPs 1 / 2 / 2; pelvic floor PTs 1 / 2 / 3; procedures $250K per urogyn FTE; ramp 55% / 80% / 95%; capex $1.0M.

7d. Combined summary

$MCapexY1Y2Y3
Satellite: system contribution1.6-0.67+0.60+2.04
Signature membership: contribution0.5-0.19+0.20+0.46
Midlife & Pelvic: system contribution1.0-0.63+0.18+1.09
Combined system contribution3.1-1.49+0.98+3.59
  of which: clinic-only contribution-2.54-1.09+0.22
  of which: downstream hospital contribution+1.05+2.07+3.37
Combined revenue (clinic)3.046.3910.11
Conservative Y3 (satellite downstream at Merritt Hawkins ~$1.35M per MD70)--~+2.5

Combined rows are sums of the reported model figures. Three-year cumulative system contribution ~+$3.08M before the $3.1M capex (contribution already deducts depreciation). Conservative case: 4 x 0.95 x $1.35M x 30% = ~$1.54M hospital contribution, so the satellite is about +$1.0M in Y3 and the total about +$2.5M ($2.53M unrounded). The combined view assumes all three start in the same year; in practice openings will be staggered.

Breakeven and sensitivities

InitiativeBreakevenSensitivity
Satellite OB/GYNSystem: operating breakeven Y2; cumulative cash positive during Y3 (~+$1.1M by end of Y3). Clinic alone: needs ~$106 collections per wRVU.At $115/wRVU the clinic earns +$0.30M/yr; at $85 it loses -$0.70M/yr (steady state, 4 MDs).
Signature membershipOperating breakeven in Y2; cumulative breakeven end of Y2. At full Y3 staffing, breakeven is ~370 members.HMO patients typically excluded; equity optics require the mission pairing.
Midlife & PelvicClinic: operating breakeven Y3; cumulative during Y5. System: positive from Y2.Steady state (Y4): revenue $4.4M, contribution +$0.52M; with a 400-member cash-pay menopause membership at $600/yr, about +$0.74M.
Upside not in totals: connected care. The Postpartum Year RPM: ~$73-140 per patient-month plus ~$22 setup at 2026 Medicare national rates (Texas Medicaid and commercial rates to confirm); SOM ~$0.5M direct, with larger value in avoided readmissions (cost-saving at a program cost of about $309 per patient; net saving about $93 per patient in one analysis) and payer quality credit. Perinatal collaborative care: ~$146-162 per patient-month (comparable Medicare APCM add-on rates, vendor-reported; 99492-99494 to confirm). eConsults: ~$35 per consult (99451). These are left out of the combined figures until Texas Medicaid fees and prior-auth paths are confirmed.

8Funding sources

SourceUseEvidence / note
Memorial Hermann funds-flow or JVSatellite and midlife capex; credit for downstream hospital marginDownstream contribution is $3.37M of the $3.59M Y3 system total. MH is already investing in Katy ($282.5M) and Cypress ($277.5M) towers.
PhilanthropyData Commons, mission pairing for Signature, endowed program supportSignature members are a grateful-patient pipeline. Peers: HM Brockman gift included a $10M OB/GYN fund; UTHealth's $22M McWilliams gift for AI.
NIH / ORWHPrediction trials, postpartum outcomes, biobankFY2026 ORWH ~$106.5M (+$30M)68; FY2027 House bill $111.5M. MFMU cooperative agreement UG1HD0405458 runs to 2030.
ARPA-HPrediction and digital toolsSprint for Women's Health67: ~$110-113M to 23-24 teams. Follow-on sprint UNVERIFIED.
PCORIComparative-effectiveness questions (FMF vs risk-factor aspirin; RPM models)Fit by design; no PCORI program figures in the source research, so confirm current funding announcements.
Industry RWE and trialsData Commons; device registriesMirvie, Thermo Fisher, BrightHeart, PeriGen; tibial stimulation makers (Valencia, BlueWind, Medtronic). Trial budgets UNVERIFIED.
MCO incentive programsPostpartum Year, CoCM, prenatal qualityTexas maternity value-based payment runs through MCO quality incentives, e.g., Community Health Choice 2026 STAR/CHIP OB Provider Incentive Program (Harris County).
HRSA / state grantsTele-MFM hub for maternity care desertsNamed as fit in the market analysis; amounts not researched.

9Implementation roadmap and KPI scorecard

First 100 days

  • Listening tour: divisions, MH leadership, Harris Health, UT Physicians
  • Replace assumptions with actuals (Section 11)
  • Learn how the 60+ referral pathway works today and baseline its funnel; confirm Abridge use in OB/GYN
  • Open funds-flow talks with Memorial Hermann
  • Drive-time study for west Fort Bend site
  • Design Postpartum Year pilot and Signature tiers with mission pairing
  • Coding integrity review (E/M, G2211)
  • Baseline cost per case, LOS, NTSV cesarean rate, supply spend

Year 1 (H1)

  • Launch Signature in an existing site (150 members)
  • Open Midlife & Pelvic Health Center: 5,000 SF fit-out ($1.0M), funded with Memorial Hermann; close-the-loop pathway live
  • Sign satellite lease; recruit first 2 MDs + 1 APP
  • Postpartum RPM pilot; start CoCM
  • sFlt-1/PlGF triage protocol
  • Submit FMF pragmatic trial and Data Commons grants
  • ERAS and OR preference-card standardization at MH-TMC; prior-auth automation

Years 2-3 (H2)

  • Satellite to 4 MDs; second satellite decision (Conroe / north Montgomery), opening in H3
  • MFM outreach clinics in Methodist corridors
  • Tele-MFM / eConsult hub and transfer agreements
  • Cardio-obstetrics clinic
  • Data Commons enrolling; first RWE contracts
  • HPV self-collection outreach; oncofertility
  • Prepare for new LBJ hospital (late 2028)
  • Gainsharing / co-management agreement with Memorial Hermann; OB safety program and liability review

H3 (years 3-5): open the second satellite if approved; scale RWE contracts and federated data partnerships, extend the hub statewide, and decide on REI (build, buy or partner).

KPIBaselineY1 targetY3 target
Satellite deliveries to MH0154532
Satellite wRVU productivity (% of AMGA median)-55%95%
Signature members0150500
Midlife center surgical cases to hospitalSet in 100 days82214
Referred 60+ women completing pathwaySet in 100 daysSet after baselineSet after baseline
Hypertensive-pregnancy patients enrolled in RPM; postpartum HTN readmissionsSet in 100 daysPilotSet after pilot
Perinatal depression screening rateSet in 100 daysSet after baselineSet after baseline
eConsults per month; HM-area referralsSet in 100 days-Set after launch
Grant submissions; industry RWE contractsSet in 100 daysSubmissions filedFirst contracts
Cost per case (cesarean, gyn surgery)Set in 100 daysBelow baselineBelow baseline
Length of stay (cesarean; hysterectomy same-day discharge share)Set in 100 daysBelow baselineBelow baseline
NTSV cesarean rateSet in 100 daysBelow baseline2-3 points below baseline
Gyn supply spend per caseSet in 100 daysBelow baseline6.5-10% below baseline
G2211 capture; note closure time; denial rateSet in 100 daysImprove vs baselineSustain
Combined system contribution, incl. MH downstream ($M)--1.49+3.59
Department-only (clinic) contribution ($M)--2.54+0.22

10Risks and mitigations

RiskImpactMitigation
No MH funds-flow agreementSatellite clinic loses -$0.56M in Y3 without downstream creditSign a service or JV agreement before the lease; stage-gate the second site
Collections below ~$106/wRVU-$0.70M/yr at $85 per wRVUPick commercial-heavy corridors; use UT Physicians actuals; go/no-go at Y1 review
Signature uptake below ~370 members, or equity opticsProgram stays negativeStart inside an existing site ($0.5M capex); keep insurance billing; pair with a mission program
Competitor responseHM or TCH builds MFM and menopause in the same corridorsMove first on MFM outreach; lead on complexity and evidence; offer partnership on transfers
Reimbursement uncertaintyTemporary +2.5% expires end of 2026; Texas Medicaid RPM and CoCM coverage unconfirmed; OPPS neuromodulation cuts proposed for 2027Keep connected care out of the base case; confirm TMPPM rules before scaling
Recruitment and rampUrogynecologist (URPS), MFM and pelvic floor PT hiring delays slow the rampRecruit early; use APPs and PTs as the margin lever; fellowship pipelines
AI accuracy and complianceUpcoding risk from AI-drafted notes; prediction models lose accuracy externallyCoding audits; silent trials before go-live; SAFE center governance
Savings accrue to partners without a gainsharing agreementHospitals capture ~$1.4-2.8M and payers ~$0.3-0.9M of cost savings while the department carries the workNegotiate gainsharing or co-management with Memorial Hermann alongside funds-flow; shared-savings asks to Medicaid MCOs; baseline costs before launch so savings can be measured
Data governanceConsent and privacy for the Data CommonsIRB protocols, broad consent, federated designs

11Assumptions to replace before decisions

Every pro forma input below is an assumption. Replace each with actuals before any capital decision.
  1. UT Physicians OB/GYN actuals: collections per wRVU (model $95), support staff ratio (3.5 FTE per MD at $58K), malpractice structure ($40K per MD; UT may be self-insured), benefits load (25%).
  2. Current deliveries at MH-TMC and LBJ (dated figures used); department deliveries placeholder of 6,000/yr in the RPM sizing; current Fetal Center volume.
  3. Memorial Hermann net revenue per delivery ($12,000) and per gyn/urogyn case ($10,000-12,000), contribution margin (30%), and funds-flow terms.
  4. Female age bands (ACS B01001 for the 9 MSA counties) and MSA births (DSHS Vital Statistics Table 9; model ~105,000).
  5. Corridor-level income and payer mix (Katy, Fulshear, Richmond/Rosenberg, Conroe, Cypress, Pearland, League City, Sugar Land); share of households earning $200K+.
  6. Competitor clinic lists verified with a drive-time map (TCH, HM, Kelsey, BSLMC, Pinnacle).
  7. MGMA OB/GYN and AUGS-MGMA urogynecology benchmarks (paywalled); urogyn collections $1.0M per FTE.
  8. The 60+ incontinence referral pathway: how it is set up, volumes, completion and outcomes (known only from briefing; nothing public).
  9. Whether OB/GYN uses Abridge today and which internal AI projects exist.
  10. Whether a cardio-obstetrics or menopause clinic exists under another name.
  11. Texas Medicaid RPM fee schedule and prior-auth path; Texas Medicaid coverage of CoCM; payer acceptance of RTM for pelvic floor training.
  12. 2026 CPT descriptors for 99470 and RTM codes; Medicare figures confirmed in the CMS PFS Look-Up Tool.
  13. 340B status of LBJ / UTHealth clinics (HRSA OPAIS).
  14. Houston Methodist payer mix, FY2025 financials, NICU levels and any postpartum RPM program.
  15. Cost section baseline: faculty count (60-80 assumed), deliveries (~8,000), cesarean rate (32%), NTSV share (35-40%), hypertensive disorders (10-15%), hysterectomies (400-700), gyn OR cases (3,000-5,000), outpatient visits (150,000-200,000), professional claims (~200,000).
  16. Current cesarean and NTSV rates at MH-TMC, the 7 suburban MH sites and LBJ; whether MH-TMC and LBJ already run cesarean and gyn ERAS.
  17. Robotic and gyn OR volumes and supply cost per case by surgeon; whether Memorial Hermann has a device reprocessing contract.
  18. Harris Health and Memorial Hermann 340B registrations and qualifying sites.
  19. Current UT System liability premium for OB/GYN faculty and the experience-rating formula.
  20. Department spend on human scribes, transcription and interpreters; denial rate (10% assumed); no-show rate.
  21. Texas Medicaid prenatal payment method (global vs per visit) and potentially preventable readmission rules for obstetrics.
  22. Primary-source checks for figures from secondary summaries (Truven 2013, Bisch 2021 meta-analysis, Edmonton supply study, AMA 2024 survey).

Sources

  1. UTHealth Houston OB/GYN department: https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/
  2. Hospitals served: https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/hospitals
  3. Urogynecology Program: https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/divisions/urogynecologists/
  4. Placenta Accreta Program: https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/divisions/placenta-accreta-program
  5. Fetal Intervention fellowship: https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/education/fellowships/fetal-center-fetal-intervention-fellowship
  6. MFMU award: https://med.uth.edu/blog/2023/06/06/mendez-figueroa-rysavy-receive-prestigious-awards
  7. MFMU and NRN: https://med.uth.edu/pediatrics/2024/06/21/uthealth-houston-receives-two-awards-for-continuing-research-in-neonatal-care-and-womens-health
  8. UG1HD040545: https://www.highergov.com/grant/UG1HD040545
  9. Abridge UT System agreement: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/ai-and-machine-learning/abridge-university-texas-system-enter-enterprise-wide-agreement-expanded-ai
  10. McWilliams School: https://sbmi.uth.edu/news/story/mcwilliams-school-of-biomedical-informatics-displays-its-new-name-to-the-world
  11. UTHealth AI Hub: https://aihub.uth.edu
  12. New LBJ hospital: https://nextlevelharrishealth.org/lbj/project-status/
  13. Texas maternal levels of care: https://www.dshs.texas.gov/dshs-ems-trauma-systems/maternal-levels-care-designation/texas-maternal-facilities
  14. UTHealth delivery volumes (teaching sites): https://med.uth.edu/obgyn/education/fellowships/maternal-fetal-medicine-fellowship/teaching-sites/
  15. Houston Methodist facts: https://www.houstonmethodist.org/newsroom/facts-statistics/
  16. Houston Methodist OB/GYN: https://www.houstonmethodist.org/for-health-professionals/department-programs/obgyn/
  17. HM Brockman gift: https://www.houstonmethodist.org/giving/articles/brockman-tower/
  18. HM Ambience rollout: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260217163873/en/Ambience-Healthcare-Announces-Houston-Methodist-Enterprise-Rollout-of-AI-Platform-to-Enhance-Patient-Care-and-Clinical-Workflows
  19. HM Form 990 FY2024: https://philanthropy.org/990/report/352410801/methodist-hospital-group
  20. TCH MFM flyer (HM West clinic): https://www.texaschildrens.org/sites/tc/files/uploads/documents/acog/MFM%20Flyer.pdf
  21. TCH Pavilion expansion: https://www.texaschildrens.org/content/news-release/texas-childrens-pavilion-for-women-completes-transformational-expansion
  22. Baylor Menopause Center: https://www.bcm.edu/healthcare/specialties/obstetrics-and-gynecology/ob-gyn-care-centers/the-menopause-center
  23. MH-TMC U.S. News: https://memorialhermann.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/top-recognition-by-us-news-for-2026
  24. MH + Midi Health: https://memorialhermann.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/midi-health-collaborate-expand-access-expert-midlife-care-women
  25. MH Katy expansion: https://memorialhermann.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/katy-hospital-announces-major-expansion-2025
  26. MH Cypress expansion: https://memorialhermann.org/about-us/newsroom/press-releases/cypress-hospital-expansion-breaks-ground
  27. Kelsey-Seybold clinics: https://kelsey-seybold.com/why-kelsey-seybold/clinics-history
  28. MSA population: https://www.citypopulation.de/en/usa/metro/26420__houston_pasadena_the_/
  29. MSA growth: https://www.costar.com/article/216091039/houston-leads-the-nation-in-population-growth-for-2025
  30. MSA ACS profile: https://censusreporter.org/profiles/31000US26420-houston-pasadena-the-woodlands-tx-metro-area/
  31. Montgomery County: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/montgomerycountytexas
  32. Fort Bend County: https://usafacts.org/answers/is-the-population-growing-or-shrinking/county/fort-bend-county-tx/
  33. Fulshear: https://houston.culturemap.com/news/real-estate/fastest-growing-wealthy-suburbs-fulshear
  34. Harris County births: https://houston.org/houston-data/population-growth
  35. Texas uninsured: https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/measures/HealthInsurance/TX
  36. Harris County uninsured: https://smartasset.com/data-studies/health-insurance-coverage-2025
  37. Medicaid-financed births: https://www.tpr.org/public-health/2026-05-13/40-000-pregnant-texans-faced-month-long-wait-for-medicaid-application-to-be-processed
  38. Texas MMMRC report: https://www.dshs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/legislative/2024-Reports/2024-MMMRC-DSHS-Joint-Biennial-Report.pdf
  39. Preterm birth report card: https://www.marchofdimes.org/peristats/reports/texas/report-card
  40. Maternity care deserts (Texas): https://marchofdimes.org/peristats/assets/s3/reports/mcd/Maternity-Care-Report-Texas.pdf
  41. 12-month postpartum Medicaid: https://fhb.hhs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/mepd-and-twh-bulletin-24-10.pdf
  42. CY 2026 PFS summary (MM14315): https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mm14315-medicare-physician-fee-schedule-final-rule-summary-cy-2026.pdf
  43. 2026 RPM codes: https://blog.prevounce.com/2026-remote-patient-monitoring-cpt-codes-whats-new-and-what-to-know
  44. RTM codes: https://www.tenovi.com/rtm-cpt-codes-2026/
  45. Care management codes: https://www.mindbowser.com/ccm-codes-cpt-variants-guide/
  46. eConsult 99451: https://aasm.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-2026-Telemedicine-Payment-and-RVU-Comparison.pdf
  47. PTNS reimbursement: https://www.medtronic.com/content/dam/medtronic-wide/public/united-states/products/neurological/posterior-tibial-nerve-stimulation-reimbursement-guide.pdf
  48. Community Health Choice OB incentive: https://provider.communityhealthchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/05/0037397_2026_STAR-CHIP_PIP-OB_Harris_121825_Final.pdf
  49. HB 2727 telemonitoring: https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/HB02727F.htm
  50. HB 1649 fertility preservation: https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/analysis/pdf/HB01649E.pdf
  51. Hospital-at-home extension: https://www.ama-assn.org/public-health/population-health/lawmakers-extend-cms-hospital-home-waiver-five-years
  52. HRT boxed warning change: https://www.patientcareonline.com/view/fda-removes-boxed-warnings-cardiovascular-cancer-dementia-risks-from-select-menopausal-hormone-therapy-labels
  53. Elinzanetant approval: https://www.bayer.com/media/en-us/bayers-lynkuet-elinzanetant-approved-in-the-us-for-treatment-of-moderate-to-severe-vasomotor-symptoms-due-to-menopause/
  54. Midi Health Series D: https://femtechinsider.com/midi-health-raises-100-million-series-d-surpasses-1-billion-valuation/
  55. Penn Heart Safe Motherhood: https://nudgeunit.upenn.edu/heart-safe-motherhood
  56. UW postpartum BP study: https://www.obgyn.wisc.edu/ob-gyn-department-news/hoppe-s-telehealth-blood-pressure-study-published-in-ajog
  57. RPM cost-effectiveness: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10428007
  58. sFlt-1/PlGF clearance: https://newsroom.thermofisher.com/newsroom/press-releases/press-release-details/2023/Thermo-Fisher-Scientific-Announces-FDA-Clearance-of-Breakthrough-Immunoassays-to-Aid-in-the-Risk-Assessment-of-Preeclampsia/default.aspx
  59. FMF screening cost-effectiveness: https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation-cti/ispor-europe-2025/poster-session-4-2/first-trimester-screening-for-preterm-pre-eclampsia-in-the-united-kingdom-a-cost-effectiveness-analysis
  60. PPH model external validation: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.08.20.25333642
  61. BrightHeart clearances: https://www.massdevice.com/fda-clears-more-brightheart-ai-capabilities-in-fetal-heart-ultrasound/
  62. Teal Wand approval: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/fda-approves-teal-healths-hpv-screening-test-home-alternative-pap-smear
  63. Hologic Genius: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240131786693/en/Hologic-Announces-First-and-Only-FDA-Cleared-Digital-Cytology-System-%E2%80%93-Genius%E2%84%A2-Digital-Diagnostics-System
  64. leva digital pelvic floor: https://urologytimes.com/view/leva-pelvic-health-system-shows-efficacy-for-improving-symptoms-of-urinary-incontinence
  65. Revi Extend: https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/fda-clears-revi-extend-bluewind-medical-urgency-urinary-incontinence
  66. UI prevalence and care-seeking: https://link.springer.com/10.1186/s12875-020-01282-y
  67. ARPA-H Sprint for Women's Health: https://arpa-h.gov/engage-and-connect/sprint
  68. ORWH FY2026: https://swhr.org/senate-appropriations-committee-advances-fy-2026-labor-hhs-bill-with-key-investments-in-public-health-and-womens-health-research/
  69. AMGA 2026 compensation survey: https://www.amga.org/getmedia/6b7fc588-0aa3-4d42-a80c-5919fb7cbbbb/2026-comp-survey-charts-doc-final.pdf
  70. Merritt Hawkins hospital revenue per physician: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/hospital-physician-relationships/the-cost-benefit-of-employed-physicians-for-18-specialties/
  71. Houston medical office rents: https://www.matthews.com/insights/houston-tx-medical-office-market-report-q4-2025
  72. Scripps concierge pricing: https://www.scripps.org/services/concierge-medicine
  73. Cesarean ERAS, 3,679 cesareans: https://blogs.the-hospitalist.org/content/enhanced-recovery-program-improves-outcomes-after-cesarean-delivery
  74. Gyn ERAS meta-analysis summary: https://nutrition-evidence.com/article/218622/enhanced-recovery-pathways-in-gynecologic-oncology
  75. Mayo gyn ERAS: https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/enhanced-recovery-pathway-effective-complex-gynecologic-surgery
  76. Same-day discharge after hysterectomy: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1307694/full
  77. Robotic vs laparoscopic hysterectomy cost (JAMA 2013): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23423414/
  78. Office hysteroscopy savings: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25392645/
  79. CMQCC NTSV cesarean reduction (JAMA): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8080226
  80. Cesarean vs vaginal birth payments: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/frmc/article/study-identifies-cost-having-baby-united-states
  81. ARRIVE resource use: https://blogs.the-hospitalist.org/content/arrive-trial-womens-desideratum-versus-logistical-concerns
  82. Postpartum telehealth BP cost analysis: https://www.obgyn.wisc.edu/ob-gyn-department-news/hoppe-published-in-journal-of-maternal-fetal-and-neonatal-medicine-0
  83. Surgeon supply scorecards: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/supply-chain/study-surgeon-scorecards-reduce-supply-cost-without-affecting-outcomes.html
  84. Unused preference-card items (JAMA Surgery): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/article-abstract/2841789
  85. Reprocessed device savings (AMDR): https://amdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Hospitals-Save-465M-and-Eliminate-95M-Pounds-of-GHG-Emissions-with-Reprocessed-Devices.Final_.pdf
  86. Harris Health 340B savings: https://www.tha.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Rep-Ted-Poe-TX-2.pdf
  87. CenteringPregnancy SC Medicaid study: https://www.centeringhealthcare.org/uploads/files/SC-Study-Cost-Savings-CenteringPregnancy-March-2016.pdf
  88. No-show cost: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4714455/
  89. MiPATH prenatal schedules: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34352810/
  90. Yale OB safety program: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/comprehensive-obstetric-patient-safety-program-reduces-liability-claims-and-payments
  91. Yale premiums: https://reliasmedia.com/articles/17184-hospital-cuts-medmal-50-in-obstetrics
  92. UT System liability plan: https://med.uth.edu/gme/professional-liability-insurance/
  93. Kaiser ambient scribe hours: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital-health/ai-scribes-save-15000-hours-and-restore-human-side-medicine
  94. AMA prior authorization survey: https://ama-assn.org/practice-management/prior-authorization/fixing-prior-auth-nearly-40-prior-authorizations-week-way
  95. Denial rework cost: https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/how-to-prevent-claim-denials-and-bolster-the-bottom-line/
  96. Video remote interpreting: https://fiercehealthcare.com/hospitals/main-line-health-video-remote-interpretation-cost-patient-satisfaction-health-it